Lord Kingsland, the Conservative spokesman in the House of Lords, agreed to table amendments put forward by the Federation. The BPF also briefed a regular group of supportive peers. However, Government Ministers took a determined stance that, having reached decisions on the form of the Bill, they were reluctant to accept any further amendments unless they proved to be politically or technically essential.

Consequently, the Bill did not complete its passage before Parliament was dissolved for the General Election. The Bill was reintroduced, with some additional provisions relating to leasehold houses and regulation of service charges. The Federation was successful in persuading the Government to accept the principles underlying .The Federation was amongst the organizations consulted on a draft of the Guidance, which it felt showed, a lack of understanding of how the lettings market worked.

and that if this conflicted with current practice, those practices would have to change. The BPF sought to ensure that its members were aware of the OFT Guidance and of the need to review their tenancy agreements in the light of the interpretation of the Regulations and the requirement that all contracts with consumers The Tenancy Deposit Scheme continued to gather strength and momentum through the year.

Ministers have agreed to extend the pilot for a further two years, with the intention of examining legislative options to ensure that ultimately all those taking deposits are subject to the same requirements. Being a first home buyer can be a stressful experience, our conveyancers will prepare perfect conveyancing report and make you stress free. There’s a number for help. A homeless person needs medical care. The Government consulted on its proposals to introduce legislation to permit selective licensing of private landlords in areas of low-demand, where the activities of some landlords was regarded as a major contributory factor to the social and economic problems there.

While the BPF had no difficulties with the proposed standards, it disagreed fundamentally with the policy, describing it as poorly conceived and probably unworkable, and criticized the consultation document as lacking intellectual rigor, assuming that the problem it sought to address was a consequence of poor housing and particular tenure arrangements, rather than a symptom of broader social and economic decline.


The BPF represented members’ concern that parking standards should not, on a blanket basis, be curtailed, and certainly not before public transport first improves. The Federation also commissioned (and provided to Government) independent research which demonstrated. The research suggested that there was a greater appreciation by local government than by national politicians of the need to match parking reductions against public transport accessibility.

It revealed that 75% of local planning authorities surveyed provide for business parking significantly in excess of that proposed in draft PPG13, many in the hope of attracting the economic benefits of B1 development to their areas. Subsequently, the Government in part met members’ concerns by increasing the B1 parking provision in the published for planning reform that would support the delivery of an efficient and fair system for all.

Most notably the Government chose to adopt the BPF’s recommendation that maximum parking standards should be relaxed for town centre developments that offer their parking arrangements as part of a pooled town centre parking scheme. The Federation led on recommendations for planning reform.

The BPF submitted the property industry’s views on the Urban White Paper, which sets out the Government’s ambitions and commitments for regenerating our towns and cities.Online property conveyancing calculator – Our valuable clients check estimate value of their real estate property and can hire online our professional real estate conveyancers. This is a forum designed to enable early consultation between both bodies and promote a greater understanding of the relationship between commercial property and heritage.

The research revealed that a high proportion of local authorities support the current system of planning obligations but would welcome moves from central Government to regularize its approach. The surprise finding of the research was that most local authorities are opposed to the introduction of a tariff approach as put forward in the Government’s Green Paper.The BPF was broadly comfortable with the main principles underlying the Bill, while having a number of outstanding concerns regarding the detailed provisions.